Am I a narcisssist for not wanting my son heavily abused and hurt? What was this sir Malcolm, Scotch flippin' mist? Where's my lad? WHERE is my son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mother 4 Justice - Elizabeth Robillard blogs and shares truth and information




Malcolm
Rifkind MP





E.C.Lucy - Robillard


Tuesday 11 October 2005

Dear Malcolm Rifkind,

first I'd like to offer my sincere commiserations at stepping down from
the leadership challenge, I am deeply sorry for the feelings it must
have invoked in you.

Please, when you have the time, would you read through my previous
correspondence and be kind enough to reply and to help us?

I would have liked to have met you (*Earls Court Square) but
I am housebound.

I would appreciate your time deeply, the main points being, my son is
living with a crack-cocaine abuser, a known child abuser and a benefit
fraudster as well as a woman-beater, all this is documented, so why my
son isn't living with me is a mystery to anyone with common sense, RBKC
social services are culpable for any harm coming to my son.

Thank you again.

Yours sincerely,

 []

A different Mother - is PAS justifiable? If the ex is a psychopath (like my son's father REALLY is) then yes, it is - RBKC legals are very dark people

Zoompad is being a teensy bit constructive these days and is writing about PAS (parental alienation syndrome, where one parent destroys the other by withholding contact of the child for no good reason, as has happened to me and Jamie, or whom bad-mouths for personal gain/sake of winning, as typical psychopaths do) The poison that IS PAS not only harms kids, it harms the perpetrator. Keeping grudges and stalking with hate crimes, catches up. Jamie's dad has been to prison for offences related to us, but the mystery is - how can corrupt RBKC legals still justify keeping my son and I apart/ my son was never 'at risk' from me, but from him. Yet they deliberately placed delicate children with him Much as I can't abide murder-by-proxy, insanely insecure and ignorant artist killers like Bob Geldof (what a good daddy, can't believe he isn't NPD  - dead wife AND child?) who has some sense sometimes, knows about PAS. It's not just 'demonic' it's insane and sick. It reflects the deep, grave wounds those individuals nurture with each day of hate they experience. They only find joy in pain and deception - there is no joy in truth or honesty nor justice only in obfuscation, how to win games and beating/harming people. RBKC is a very dark place indeed

Note to Corrupt Kensington Police - not just Ali Dizae (narcissists aren't always ASPD)

I was harassed by an insidious dog of a bullying gossip (was concerned for a small child there) and got a criminal record for complaining about that particular stalker (the old bag is still at it) why was that? Because the rest of the world can see how corrupt and wrong that is even if you are all completely blind to criminal wrong doing. Evil is coming from your department, not from me. You are covering up child murder, rape, abuse and trafficking. What kind of creatures are you? What type of paedophile pulls your rotten little strings? Thank god there are better police in the world doing the job of ten to cover your corrupt obese extremities

Even the Legal Ombudsman fears the control freaks - and they wonder why the world protests at the corruption?

 AND there was never an allocated worker. Corrupt? Yep

Thank you for your email.

Please note that we  are a separate organisation to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and have no influence over their decisions or processes.

Yours sincerely

Assessment Centre

Legal Ombudsman

Telephone: 0300 555 0333

www.legalombudsman.org.uk

From: Robillard]
Sent: 10 May 2011 18:38
To: Christian Paterson
Cc: SNIP
Subject: RE: Your enquiry: reference 201013366

10th May 2011

REF; 201013366 Anne Lehane, SRA non-action

Further to letters from the SRA months ago, they have still not allocated a worker to this case, please advise?

Yours sincerely

E.C.Lucy
sw5 9ba

---

From: Christian.Paterson@Legalombudsman.org.uk
To: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Your enquiry: reference 201013366
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:59:07 +0000

Dear Ms Lucy

Thank you for your email.

The Legal Ombudsman investigates complaints into the service that someone has received from their lawyer.

We have attached a leaflet on how we can assist, and also a complaint form so that you can articulate the details of your complaint.

Before we can formally investigate a complaint, we require that the person bringing the complaint formally complains to the lawyer in writing and then allows them up to eight weeks to respond to it. We have also attached a template complaint letter if you require assistance with this.

Please be aware that there are two relevant time limits: the '12 month rule' and the '6 month rule'. Generally speaking, your complaint should be brought to us no later than 12 months from when the problem occurred or from when you should reasonably have become aware of the problem. Suppose the problem occurred, or you became aware of the problem, at the end of March 2010. You should bring your complaint to us before the end of March 2011.

Plus, you should come to us within 6 months of receiving a final response from your lawyer after complaining to them. Suppose you complained to your lawyer about the problem at the end of June 2010 and they responded with a final offer to sort things out in the middle of August last year. You're still not happy with what they offered. You would have until the middle of February this year (2011) to bring your complaint to us.

We would suggest that you contact our assessment centre on 0300 555 0333 where an assessor will be able to provide you with advice and assistance regarding your complaint.

If we do not hear from you within seven days, we will presume that you no longer wish to pursue with your complaint and will close your case.

Yours sincerely

Assessment Centre

Legal Ombudsman

Telephone: 0300 555 0333

www.legalombudsman.org.uk

From: Miss Ec Lucy [mailto:chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk]
Sent: 14 February 2011 08:44
To: Enquiries
Subject: FW: Anne Lehane - Solicitor Complaint

---

From: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk

Subject: RE: Anne Lehane - Solicitor Complaint
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:36:35 +0000

SRA
RE Anne Lehane, Slctr R.B.K.C
Feb. 14th  2011


x 4 attachments


Dear Madam /Sir


Further to my requests for time-limits [] and your code-of practice:


Mss Lehane knowingly submitted false evidence in court to Judge Moorehouse during care proceedings.
She also omitted to inform the judge that by law, despite my being disabled (also with severe back problem (still) and grieving my mother, dead in the February of that year)  that my son nor I had no care plan despite a care-pan assessment in the April of 2001, Lettie Bluthe and Anne-Marie Wilson were the social workers. She ommited the fact I had complained to Jane Dykins of GBH by the SSD due to cosntant hrassments, lies and threats, denied in court.  The law then stated that care-pans should be implemented within 40 days.

Anne Lehane had had access to previous records (Matrimonial proceedings ending in March 1999, Kingston + Wandsworth Courts, Judge Walker Smith ++) Case Ref 92D 1089-

Just a year prior to the care-proceedings (where I had called social services emergency line all night and had had no response at all, so called police, thus placing my son in care voluntarily- a a police protection order was made- despite my home had been disgusting it was clean two days later- IGNORED by RBKC) Sean Ryan, our then social worker at RBKC and others, supported my parenting in 1999. In 2001 and 2002 onwards Miss Lehane knowingly kept evidence that could have changed the outcome of the case.  She kept evidence from the court of Autism expert, Prof.Eric Fombonne who had visited in the custody/RO/contact hearing, only to bring in yet another expert as she had allowed a social worker, Anne-Marie Wilson, to write what culminated in character assassination of me, with a falsified document, that was hearsay at best, in this document the social worker claimed I had self-diagnosed my own agoraphobia (my first treatment of it by the council, was in 1973, I had been agoraphobic in varying degrees my entire life and Miss Lehane and others knew it well, they had had access to all my records, although since then, I have had an apology from  KC PCT (Patricia Wright) as my records were mixed in with other patients,


Miss Lehane also claimed via this 'evidence' from Anne Marie Wilson (SW), also claimed I had diagnosed my son with a gut-problem and autism when she knew this was done by Simon Murch and I hadn't even been present, plus nobody had given consent - see a snip from my sister attached)  Miss Lehane had full knowledge that I had represented myself with lay-barrister Peter Bibby in 1996-7 at a SENDIST Tribunal and that due to that my son had seen quite a few consultant professionals (including NHS expert Dr.Hilary Cass) regarding diagnosis (he is SLD/Autism) my son had been statemented since 1995 (?) approx and regualry seen by local Ed.Pysch, Patsy Wagner and also including prominent experts such as Svien Eikeseth, Glenn Sallows and Esther Shaffer (R.I.P) -who's report was also left out of the care-proceedings that James did have some words- Miss Lehane is apparently covering up the fact my son ever spoke and although he didn't have fluent language he could speak a little and had was showing huge promise- she failed to inform the judge in the care proceedings of the mental problems and suicide attempts of the father and that the father is a drink-rive recidivist, had cheated benefits and tax, Hadn't paid court fees not any Child Maintenance in eight and half years (still outstanding) had been to prison for drug dealing, and had frequent hallucinations he is 'the devil'. LAC reviews were never legally abided by, I was never represented and was refused telephone links- as for the hearing- the care proceedings- I had access to only one and half days of the hearing , the rest was heard without my having access due to the video equipment having broken down, that violated article 6- despite Gordon Murdoch QC and Malcolm Chisholm representing me, I did not have a chance to intervene where I could have and let the judge know what was going on- Miss Lehane knowingly wasted public money on expert reports when she already had full access to many expert reports- via a tribunal I was running a home education at the time after having won the land-mark ruling ( see Luvy V RBKC) - there was no need for any expert reports. Miss Lehane also allowed evidence to claim I had diagnosed my son with a 'gut problem' when I wasn't even present at that diagnosis - my sister was present, Dr.Murch - a child-gastroenetolgist diagnosed my son wit the 'outlawed' LNH 4 and had sent me pictures of it- he had been my GP, Dr. Kate O'Briens'- next door neighbour- that GP had then tried to help us discover why my son was clutching at his tummy. I also had had a report from the Priory clinic regarding my agoraphobia and good character that she also had access to, she had reports from local experts and doctors , plus evidence that social workers had been 'pre-planning' to take Jamie into care as Jamie had been seen by Dr, Murch (apparently this means 'munchausens syndrome by proxy') that evidence was omitted from the court- a total mystery-  yet she and local solicitors and the barristers colluded to waste taxpayers money and take my child - as it was- Judge Moorehouse made the attached recommendation - that my relationship to my son was 'too important' not to have 'unsupervised overnight contact' but due to pure malice- Miss Lehalne advised social workers to reduce my contact with my son and has knowingly left my son at risk with his very violent and dangerous father- who sadly also has/had custody of a his daughter, Maxine, when a child, Cosmo Steele, already died in his care aged just four. the child was claimed to have died of cot-death and heart-disease. I had been 'suffocated' with a pillow by Mr.Jones (the father) and had to fight for my life, attempted murder charges should have been brought. Cosmo was found asphyxiated. I know from the previous (documented) violence I had suffered, and known about by Miss Lehane, these children are left at risk with him. I have suffered much malice and violations of much law due to the advice that stops at the hand of Miss Lehane, who has always blamed social workers - saying it her being directed by them, specifically by Brett Taylor. I do not believe that to be the complete  case, I believe she has deliberately mislead some social workers I  believe there should be a public inquiry, the case went on for something like ten days and I HAD ACCESS to TWO of those days- There is more I will follow up with when able. Thank you for your time

Yours sincerely
SNIP

Information depends on 'memory' in RBKC?

--047d7bdc78aee7cc750502b51b49
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sept. 10th 2014

Dear Mr.Yu

Thanks. Surely your legal department would hold copies? Five years ago is
recent (depending on your priorities) If not - for the sake of clarity and
probity - please use this email as a FOIA request and be kind enough please
to provide me with details of payments to charities from RBKC within the
last 10 years

Yours sincerely

E. Lucye Robillard
sw5 9ba



On 10 September 2014 13:12, <Robin.Yu@rbkc.gov.uk> wrote:

>  Dear Ms. Robillard,
>
>
>
> That was our final response. I can=E2=80=99t comment further as it was 5 =
years ago
> so I can=E2=80=99t remember what discussions we had and all emails in rel=
ation to
> the request have been deleted.

RBKC for many years has openly subsidised charities - what IS this denial? Corruption?

-001a11c12d48388a3a0502b4ad3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Dear Mr.Yu

There s no response to the FOIA request other than a denial of knowing of
any subsidy/'not held' - is that correct? That RBKC does not  subsidise?
Because it does and  it has, and the police are looking.



On 10 September 2014 12:45, <Robin.Yu@rbkc.gov.uk> wrote:

>  Dear Mrs. Robillard,
>
>
>
> We responded to this request through whatdotheyknow and we completed an
> internal review too:
>
>
>
> https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/rbkc_charities_subsidies
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely
>
>
>
> *Robin Yu*
>
> Information Protection Assistant
>
> Information Governance Team
>
> Information Systems Division (ISD)
>
> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
>
> The Town Hall, Hornton Street, London W8 7NX
>
> Tel: 020 7938 8226

Kensington not adhering to its duties - this FOIA request remains unanswered - since 2009 - a reminder for the sake of probity for RBKC

--20cf3074d57204de630502b473c1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Sept 10th 2014

Dear Mr.Yu [ed.foia officer]

Sorry to disturb you but the following FOIA req from 

2009 has still not been answered, is there a good reason for this? 

I think it looks poor for RBKC not to have it answered.

Thanks (from whatdotheyknow.com )

From: Liz R (Account suspended)

9 December 2009

Dear Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea,

1.How many charities/NGO'S (within RBKC) Does RBKC/the government
subsidise?

2.How many are not subsidised by RB KC/The government and what are
the names of those charities (non-subsidised)

3.How many charities/NGO's have had to close
since January 7th 1997 and December 8th 2009 and what are the names
of those charities (one we believe was Kensington and Chelsea
Advocacy Alliance or KCAA, (Please clarify))

4. How many non-subsidised charities also have
RBKC employees assisting them in some way? (Full of Life and RBKC
employee counsellor Roz/Ros comes to mind)

5. How much was spent in total on charitable subsidies by RBKC
between January 1 1997 and December 9th 2009 and what are the names
of the charities?

6. Please provide a breakdown of each charities' financial benefit
from RBKC subsidies PA since January 1st 2001 to December 9th 2009

Yours sincerely


Liz R

How to spot a paedophile

According to the FBI - a 'down turned mouth' is one of the signatures of a paedophile - I had a look at someone who lies a lot - the SUPER INJUNCTION gag-seeker Erika Endlein - today ( ex RBKC now manager of children's disability team in Hammersmith ) has a very dodgy gob - (waves) and
also was considering John Ward's post about nailing Jack The Ripper - asked him if had even conisdered Arthur Munby (a relative of James, our own legal whizz and Special Needs - child 'cherry-picker' of presiding over  SENDIST tribunals ) Now don't get me wrong - he pursued those rotten councils for communications devices for disabled kids - didn't he? Sudden gasps? We shall see sir, cuz they all look a teensy bit fucking guilty right now.  Abusing the disabled with apparent impunity, is now stopped.

Evidence - this was covered up - lots was covered up

They kept on at me to have therapy, despite having therapy - and offering to do anything at all - the judge wanted Jamie to spend weekends with me - but the hate and spite from RBKC SS - stopped that - horrible abuse 

2014 - still no justice - Son still missing - god knows what's happened to him RBKC

From: Liz R (Account suspended)
16 May 2011
Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please willyou be kind enough to poit me in a direction where I can
access justice in regard to the content herein as follows? It is in
email format dated 2006, the circumstances are worse (attachments
on request)
Dear Miss Downes [HM Courts] & Sir Rifkind,
please file the letter (below this) and attachments - I do not have
email addresses for Harris Temperley or CAFCASS.
I am requesting a public inquiry,
Dear Malcolm Rifkind,
I am writing to request you call for a public inquiry into the care
order that affects my son, Jamie Jones, and myself.
It's been a campaign of hate and cover-ups, conspiracy to pervert
justice, and as Mr.Simon Tyler (a friend and director of [mencap]
Equal People KC ) said to me 'it is [case against me] completely
criminal';
This case against myself has been brought, in my belief, to
cover-up peadophilic crimes against my son, whom is mute and
vulnerable, and I am continued to be villified due to the criminal
withlding of information, conspiracy and perjury of social workers
and CAFCASS involved. READ MORE