Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts

13 Nov 2014

Emotional Abuse is worse than beatings, worse than rape, worse than broken bones - why?

Mother 4 Justice - Elizabeth Robillard blogs and shares truth and information


Emotional abuse creates a negative and sick character, it creates addictions, mental illness, suicide, weakness and disability, often for life.

  When you undermine, devalue and terrify the weak and vulnerable, you create problems for the world as well as making a heavy burden on the good taxpayers who need to fund mental health services.

 It's in the interest of all, to ensure that all children are listened to, respected and encouraged to follow paths that they find reinforcing and useful, as long as there's no harm in it.

 There's a great new 'global' generation coming, of children of the digital age, who won't understand the abuses of the past as we do, they will understand NPD and abuse and want to help.

Meantime - it's vital for all sufferers of NPD abusers to support each other and find each other - NPD's and psychopaths have hurt billions of people.

It's  time to help the rest of the world recover from them. Just do not get the diagnosis wrong. Good luck to all good people who have suffered NPD abuse and who are actively assisting the weak with their exceptional insight, like Sam Vaknin does. 


10 Nov 2014

Emergency Help Needed for Scottish Children

Monday 10 November 2014

Dear Lord Adonis,

I trust this finds you well, your good work speaks for itself. thank
you.

I'd like to draw your attention to a very disturbing lack of service in
Scotland.

Children are reported as being born but not being registered and being
abused and killed for 'snuff' movies, that are naturally causing much
mental anguish across the board.

See the Daily Record of today's date
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/real-life/children-scotland-been-filmed-being-4597107

I am developing an NGO that serves only to promote and supply software
and hardware to disabled children in care - visit us here
http://onlinechurchofwordsofchrist.webs.com

I would appreciate your emergency input and to treat this matter of
lack of registration of newborns and lack of services as a first
priority.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,


Elizabeth Lucye Robillard

6 Nov 2014

People responsible (or not) for the welfare of children - covered up by BBC? Discussed 2008

Sunday, 3 February 2008

FAMILY LAW- Vulnerable Mafia?

Family Law: Vulnerable Mafia (gagged by the Brown Broadcasting C....)

'There is a hidden small civil war, happening now between defenceless parents, biased closed family law practices and local Social Services departments in various areas in the UK.

Some families are being deprived of justice and are pushed to the point of suicide and disability due to the enormous strain of having to fight for their lives in secret family courts, these crimes are being commited within the Public Family Law courts in the UK.

Most parents in this situ have no option but to fight the monumental might of a council, with their unlimited resources, the parents often without unbiased professional aid.

These parents are fighting not only for their children but for their reputation -so easily tarnished due false allegations and exaggeration of 'behavior' as a result of draconian actions by councils and family courts.

Malicious gossip and whispering campaigns in Local Authorities must be outlawed as 'Hate Crime' and perpetrator brought to justice.

These rotten campaigns spread into every area of a persons' life.

False allegations and oppression against parents often leave the parents incapable of caring for their family without help, due to widespread failing health from the stress of the fight- like a self-fulfilling prophecy - manipulated by councils.

A simple dislike of a particular parent/s can trigger a domino-effect of emotional torture and charachter assassination against innocent people by professionals employed in the name of 'care' when it is rather 'Authoritian Dictatorship'- destruction of a good family by councils because they CAN do it and do, all too easily.

Presumably the councils intention to effectively destroy a families' life forever for fun (I have seen Social Workers say 'let's stop [] seeing the kid!!' ) whilst actually simply securing the need for their own welfare whilst filling budgets to justify their employment.

A social worker or other council professional (whom has the opulence of unlimited legal support) creates and manipulates a domino-effect of emotional torture so as to effectively destroy a families' life forever.

All in a days work.

Social Services are responsible for childrens' welfare- to drag them screaming from loving parents' or leaving them exposed to other dangers cannot ever be justified outside of the secret family courts, wars have been started for less. '

F4J and the public courts are two different matters. Public courts are the ones where social services dominate the proceedings and dictate to the judges, charmingly spout lies to gain their incentives (need to fill adoption/fostering/special needs []slots) they have teams of legal and medical professionals all backing each other so a hapless innocent parent (target) is left with no recourse at all against the monolithic wall of power that has no governing body. Childrens’ Social Services have no governing body as of April 2007, Judges have no governing body and someone call Trading Standards as they are not working on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.

In fact it appears we have Family Lawer Mafia running the PUBLIC family law courts (social service domination) . The PRIVATE (divorce) family law courts are open, but CAFCASS are involved in both types of courts. It’s important to distinguish between these two types of court as mothers are generally the targets in public - Elizabeth Robillard

------------------------------------------------------------

social workers the ultimate narcissists, please see my website;

The fact that social workers and employees involved with any local authority, such as those permanent employees at Adoption and Permanancy panels globally are given training in matters pertaining to family law prior to any proceedings. That's illegal isn't it? Isn't that a bias before a case is begun and therefore a violation of a fair hearing [Article 6 ECHR]?

This Leaves a vulnerable, hapless parent [target] violated by professional bullies whom are legally-trained (and trained in the latest 'psych techniques' too! Aren't we modern? Please see article 'psychiatry is redundant' with refs) .

The fact that social workers regard themselves as superior is an outrage and purely political - they are great puppets for their managers. They cannot move beyond BASIC psychology OR politics.


Not to mention the childrens' wishes completely unheard.

Nobody has mentioned the children who die on the streets fleeing care-homes- have they? Who cares about them? Shelter probably.

They (targets) do not stand a chance, especially once the parent has employed a family solicitor, all parties (except the parent-client-target) then these professionals collaborate regarding timing, payment, likely outcome of case and SO much more - all without the 'client' [ target parent] knowing about it. These professionals have access to all records, letters and every type of detail of your life.

Privacy of family courts? There's no privacy, there is for the courts.

They snort at the profits, in a joyful way.

This legal training for social workers ( Cafcass, etc) makes it a plain case of violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights' Act before any case has even reached court. Doesn't it?

Thank you for reading.

Elizabeth Robillard  READ MORE

19 Oct 2014

United against communist oppression - I HATE CONTROL FREAKS - and then - the ICO Iman spoketh

So we're all united in that. The BBC appear to be sweaty and clambering over each others backs (not the kids?) but not in a joyful way any more, I wonder why? They are considering what may happen to them (enjoy the Tree of Life!)  - I guess - with the world looking at the 'BBC Children in Need' money (in MUCH finer detail, and then under the teenier grains of sand) and the 'BBC Action' community posts that were pulled, and who's order THAT was...because that was also BBC Children in Need 'BBC Media Action’? And so  - Iman of the ICO sayeth 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <casework@ico.org.uk>
Date: 16 October 2014 10:51
Subject: IRQ0555556, response from ICO[Ref. IRQ0555556]
To: f@gmail.com


16th October 2014

Case Reference Number IRQ0555556
 Dear Ms Robillard

Thank you for your correspondence of 19 September 2014 in you you made a request for information to the ICO.

In this correspondence you requested:

“Please will you provide me with the following information? This is a FOIA request. 

1. who, names please are/is responsible for payments to 

2. When was the decision made to make BBC Media Action not accountable to the law?  

3. Does the BBC have a list of its investments that are available to the public if not; may we have a reason given for that please?”

Response to request

Firstly, it may be of assistance to explain that the ICO regulates the Data Protection Act and the Freedom of Information Act and would likely hold information about an organisation if there was a complaint about them or we were engaging with them. 


Having considered the type of information you are asking for and also having carried out reasonable searches we have not been able to locate any information to answer your questions posed under number 1, 2 and 3. For clarity, we have searched our information management systems for complaints or documents held about “BBC Media Action” “BBC list of investments” and can confirm the following; no complaints have been brought to the attention of the ICO about BBC Media Action. There is also no information held on our records management system about “BBC list of investments”. If you have reasons to believe that the ICO holds this information please clarify why, this may assist us in targeting further searches.

If however you wish to bring a concern to the attention of the ICO about “BBC Media Action” or “the BBC's” compliance with the Information Acts including publication schemes and refusal to provide information please use the following link to report it to us

http://ico.org.uk/concerns


I am sorry we could not be of more assistance on this occasion

If you are dissatisfied with the response you have received and wish to request a review of our decision or make a complaint about how your request has been handled you should write to the Information Access team at the address below or e-mailaccessicoinformation@ico.org.uk.

Your request for internal review should be submitted to us within 40
working days of receipt by you of this response. Any such request received after this time will only be considered at the discretion of the
Commissioner.

If having exhausted the review process you are not content that your request or review has been dealt with correctly, you have a further right of appeal to this office in our capacity as the statutory complaint handler under the legislation.  To make such an application, please visit the ‘Concerns’ section of our website to make a Freedom of Information Act or Environmental Information Regulations complaint online.

A copy of our review procedure is available here
http://ico.org.uk/about_us/~/media/documents/library/Corporate/Notices/ico_review_procedure_v9.ashx



Yours sincerely

Iman Elmehdawy
Lead Information Access Officer